|
Dialectic, viewed from an educational and functional perspective, is
concerned with the deeply felt needs, desires and wants of human
natural functioning, and their integration through guiding ideas,
directions and intents into effective action. Dialectic aims at the
dynamic, action-oriented, moral, purposive dimension in human life,
that part which is the inwardly felt impulse for the initiation of an
action (its telos, purpose.) It seeks to bring out this
essential purpose as the moral guiding force of the whole experiencing
process.
When applied to the disciplines of somatic functional
learning, this perspective on Socratic Dialectic can clarify and bring
out such a dimension in them. This dimension then becomes the unifying
and directing principle of the functional dialectical method, just as
the purposive dimension is central in the total human process. The
moral, purposive dimension thus becomes primary, and the somatic,
functional method becomes clearly defined and used as a means to serve
this end.
This clarification of purpose is simply the equivalent of
putting the specifically human concerns of living as the first
priority. Integrating action and function, as in the somatic functional
disciplines, follows and serves this priority.
What I most want to bring out in this chapter is that the
central act of dialectical functional learning is a deep, fundamental
felt-experiential act of choice. This is a felt shift that happens in
the subtle feeling life-energy (i.e. eros) through the
examination of desire and the subsequent choice for what is morally
good; and that ideas (ideai, in the specifically dialectical
functional sense, which will come out more clearly as we go along) are
the pivotal points of focus and the essential instruments for that
shift. This central act of moral choice is what acts most truly as a
guiding principle for the course and flow of the dialectical process,
and more particularly for the right use of Socratic questioning.
Moral Choice
Fundamental experiential choice is a felt shift, through
which the potential for directing action is explicitly brought out.
This choice is the transformational power of functional learning, and
it is what we are especially trying to evoke and awaken through
dialectical inquiry.
Therefore, I will now elaborate on fundamental
experiential choice. It is central to Dialectic and to functional
learning, and it is the basis for the learning process described in the
next section of this chapter. I will also discuss the link between
Dialectic, functional learning, and fundamental experiential choice.
We are always giving "directions for the use of the self"
to ourselves. These directions are in the form of messages and images
that we play to ourselves as cues for habitual responses. We construct
these cues in our own peculiar ways (internal communication.) They may
be simple or they can be complex (such as some combination or sequence
of visual, auditory and kinesthetic representations.)
These cues direct our life-energy, giving it structure
functional, experiential nature of Plato's language (logos) of
Dialectic, and prepare the way for understanding how this ancient art
may be enacted today.
Many aspects of Dialectic and of functional learning
utilize fundamental experiential choice.
Imaging is one example: when you project an idea, it goes
through your whole energy field as a psychic life energy form (eidos.)
This form is the fundamental direction for the creation of your
experience, perception and action. This is happening whether you are
consciously aware of it or not. You are thus creating your experience
all the time even if you are not conscious of doing it or how you are
doing it.
Fundamental experiential choice is the central act of
repatterning. Repatterning occurs through felt shifts that move through
and effect the various structures of experiencing that give
representation (image) to the basic felt-experiencing. It is choice of
attention that is the real key to patterning and repatterning. This is
what all methods and techniques of repatterning (whether body movement,
mental, psychological or emotional) work with, mostly implicitly.
However, the experiential repatterning of Dialectic adds
a significant element of precision, specificity and effectiveness to
the act of fundamental experiential choice, while maintaining the
process' rootedness in ongoing felt experiencing. How this is
accomplished will be discussed next.
The dialectical use of felt-experiencing is not merely
somatic and organic, but goes beyond this to the deep feeling core of
human moral choices. The Socratic inquiry suggests the following: the
"problems" of life are moral, i.e. they all stem from misdirection of
self, and this is what needs investigation, not the problem itself. By
entering into the dialectical process you discover that you are
responsible for your actions and your experiencing. By becoming
conscious of this responsibility you can redirect and master your
experience, perception, action and your life. This is what Socratic
moral responsibility is, as investigated, remembered, and actualized in
Dialectic. It is the purification of truth from illusory self-images,
rather than the getting rid of a problem. The problem, if there is one,
is in the misperception and resulting misdirection of self.
This new way of being is the basis for a wholly new type
of action, expression and relationship to the whole situation.
Dialectic's purpose is not to cure, fix, heal, ameliorate or indulge
suffering (pathos.) Nor is it to identify suffering as a problem
against which to apply a solution. Dialectic's purpose is to precisely
examine suffering through the process of felt-experiential inquiry.
Through this process, the sufferer can see what he is doing, and can
then release himself from the suffering he is creating, into er
freedom.
So, a primary aim of Dialectic is to evoke this awakening
of self to its directing activity. This is done, as a practice and
method, simply by exploring this whole territory in a full dialectical
interplay, and following the experiencing where it leads. The
exploration brings awareness to that territory of self, and this is a
recollection (anemnesis) and an awakening. To come alive to that
self-referal directing activity of soul (psyche) is the soul's
distinctive moral power (its specific arete.)
The practice of Dialectic is fundamentally the practice
of subtle discriminating during the act of experiencing. This is the
same discernment of choice used when experiencing a felt shift. But the
central act of Dialectic is an act of choice in the "use of the self."
Through Dialectic we guide our deeply felt needs, impulses and desires (eros)
into integrated, proper use, to attain natural happiness.
It is important to discuss how Dialectic achieves such
discrimination. Knowing what you are doing (through self reflection on
your current reality and perception of how you are directing yourself),
is the basis for what Alexander [F.M. Alexander, the creator of the
Alexander technique] called "inhibition" of that doing. It is not
inhibition in the sense of forcibly stopping action. It is simply
taking a look at what you have been doing. That vision creates distance
from the action, thereby taking you out of automatic immersion in the
action. Conditioning is therefore no longer a determining and
compulsive force because you have stepped back to see for the first
time what you have been doing.
This seeing is not enough in itself, though. Once you
have reached the point of suspension (aporia) of your current
actions, you have opened a space for the creation and projection of new
directions for new action, based on the discovery and expression of
what you truly desire (your idea of the good, for you, and of
what you want to create in your life. )
The creation of these new directions for the use of the
self, within the fertile space of the suspension of your previous
habits of action, sets up a natural dynamic (dialectical) tension
impelling you toward the desire-filled new vision or idea.
Energy is attracted to flow through and in this new idea as a
path of least resistance (which is a fundamental principle of all
natural functioning, called the "law of least action.") The direction
of
this dynamic tension is toward release, ease, opening and fulfillment
of desire, away from resistance, pain, holding, unfruitful "wrong
doing" that has no real charm. The new creative idea actually becomes
much more charming to awareness as a new natural direction for the
whole self, thereby making its use and implementation probable and
almost inevitable.
This approach (as in all repatterning, but fully and
explicitly realized in Dialectic) completely eliminates the need or the
desirability of working with "problems". The problems and concerns of
life are looked at as current perceptions of reality, and through
self-reflection brought to a state of suspension (every good drama has
suspense at its pivotal central core, and Dialectic is high drama.) In
this suspension new creative ideas can powerfully and quite naturally
redirect all the energies, forces and aspects of the self.
Dialectic, then, uses movement in, around, and through a
felt shift and release. Dialectic's process is a basic act of
transformation, levering into it from varied angles, perspectives and
approaches, but always following the energy of opening where it leads.
There is no need for any elaboration beyond this natural movement of
dialogue around the felt shift, because the felt shift experienced
through Dialectic is transformation.
To be guided in dialogue by attentiveness to felt
experiencing and to the felt shift follows one of the main guiding
principles of Plato's Dialectic: to always be guided by the logos
(the articulation of the idea through "true speech.")
This principle corresponds to the other main principle of
Dialectic, which is to always be guided by the energy of eros,
the deep-feeling desire for wholeness, union and communion in
transcendent love.
These two laws correspond to the two primary factors that
create the right atmosphere for the activity of fundamental
experiential choice: 1. the dynamics of attention to the felt shift
(with questioning, perspectives and various other approaches serving
this attentiveness), and 2. the energy relationship in presence, love
and awareness.
To summarize, fundamental experiential choice is the
middle way between the misdirections of action that either aimlessly
let
things happen, or try to force them to happen. The functional learning
disciplines, guided by Dialectic, use the act of fundamental
experiential choice to achieve a liberating transformation of self.
This
is accomplished by experiencing a felt sense of what you have been
doing, letting that felt sense shift in your experiencing, and then
choosing what emerges from that shift.
This shift is not to another way of doing what you were
doing (that was wrong doing, perhaps with a wrong aim), but to an
entirely other way of being with and in the whole situation. This is a
release of "end-gaining" and a shift to "process", to whole-body
heart-felt intuitive knowing.
This discriminating is carried on through a process
similar to Focusing [a "functional learning" technique developed by
Eugene Gendlin.] Focusing uses such acts as "checking," "fitting", etc.
in the play of outward life-action to relate those actions back to
inward felt sensing. The criteria for the "fit" is the direct feeling
sense of eros and the discernment of telos.
In terms of practice, what happens is that you do
something, and then check back. Does it really give a felt sense of
completion, of rightness? Does it satisfy the desired aim that you
intended? Feel it, test it. Then adjust, go through the process again,
act and check back, feel and adjust. Discriminate as you go along.
Reach into that quiet inward sensing place to the felt
sense of shift and opening. Let it be, let it happen in itself. Give it
attention while it moves and opens up. Recognize it, affirm it, choose
it as a "direction" to set in motion your thoughts, feelings and action.
Stay with that feeling sense and its outward connection
into use and expression. Let it follow through into action and
expression.
Stay centered in the fundamental choice as you act
outwardly. You choose the whole experience in your active open
attention
to it from the place of the felt sense; but you don't do anything to
make it happen. Action starts from and inevitably flows out from the
place of choice.
To
continue, go back to the Scholarly Validation page.
|
|